Publications

The following is a selected list of publications that used or are about OpenSHA. Please let us know of any others that should be listed.

Field, E.H., T.H. Jordan, and C.A. Cornell (2003), OpenSHA: A Developing Community-Modeling Environment for Seismic Hazard Analysis, Seismological Research Letters, 74, no. 4, p. 406-419. [Please use this reference when citing OpenSHA]

Field, E. H, N. Gupta, V. Gupta, M. Blanpied, P. Maechling, and T.H. Jordan (2005a), Hazard calculations for the WGCEP-2002 earthquake forecast using OpenSHA and distributed object technologies, Seismological Research Letters, 76, p. 161-167, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1785/gssrl.76.2.161.

Field, E.H., V. Gupta, N. Gupta, P. Maechling, and T.H Jordan (2005b), Hazard Map Calculations Using GRID Computing, Seismological Research Letters, 76, no. 5, p. 565-573, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1785/gssrl.76.5.565.

Field, E. H, H. A. Seligson, N. Gupta, V. Gupta, T. H. Jordan, and K. Campbell (2005c), Loss Estimates for a Puente Hills Blind-Thrust Earthquake in Los Angeles, California, Earthquake Spectra, 21, p. 329-338, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1898332.

Maechling, P., V. Gupta, N. Gupta1, E.H. Field, D. Okaya, and T.H. Jordan, 2005a, Seismic Hazard Analysis Using Distributed Computing in the SCEC Community Modeling Environment, Seismological Research Letters, 76, no. 2, p. 177-181, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1785/gssrl.76.2.177.

Maechling, P., V. Gupta, N. Gupta1, E.H. Field, D. Okaya, and T.H. Jordan, 2005b, Grid Computing In The SCEC Community Modeling Environment, Seismological Research Letters, 76, no. 5, p. 581-587, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1785/gssrl.76.5.581-a.

Field, E. H., R. J. Arrowsmith, et al. (2014). Uniform California Earthquake Rupture Forecast, Version 3 (UCERF3)—The time‐independent model, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 104(3), p. 1122–1180, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1785/0120130164.

Field, E. H., G. P. Biasi, et al. (2015). Long‐term time‐dependent probabilities for the third Uniform California Earthquake Rupture Forecast (UCERF3), Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 105(2A), p. 511–543, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1785/0120140093.

Field, E. H., K. R. Milner, et al. (2017). A spatiotemporal clustering model for the third Uniform California Earthquake Rupture Forecast (UCERF3‐ETAS): Toward an operational earthquake forecast, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 107(3), p. 1049–1081, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1785/0120160173.

Field, E. H., T. H. Jordan, M. T. Page, K. R. Milner, B. E. Shaw, T. E. Dawson, G. P. Biasi, et al. (2017). A synoptic view of the third Uniform California Earthquake Rupture Forecast (UCERF3), Seismol. Res. Lett., 88(5), p. 1259–1267. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1785/0220170045.

Milner, K. R., E. H. Field, W. H. Savran, M. T. Page, and T. H. Jordan (2020). Operational earthquake forecasting during the 2019 Ridgecrest, California, earthquake sequence with the UCERF3‐ETAS model, Seismol. Res. Lett., 91(3), p. 1567–1578. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1785/0220190294.

Milner, K. R., Shaw, B. E., Goulet, C. A., Richards‐Dinger, K. B., Callaghan, S., Jordan, T. H., Dieterich, J. H., & Field, E. H. (2021). Toward physics‐based nonergodic PSHA: A prototype fully deterministic seismic hazard model for Southern California. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 111(2), 898-915.

Field, E. H., K. R. Milner, et al. (2023). The USGS 2023 conterminous U.S. time‐independent earthquake rupture forecast, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 114(1), p. 523–571, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1785/0120230120.

Petersen, M. D., A. M. Shumway, et al. (2024). The 2023 US 50-State National Seismic Hazard Model: Overview and implications, Earthquake Spectra, 40(1), p. 5–88, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/87552930231215428.

Milner, K. R., and E. H. Field (2024). A comprehensive fault‐system inversion approach: Methods and application to NSHM23, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 114(1), p. 486–522, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1785/0120230122.

This website is generated automatically from the OpenSHA wiki on GitHub, and is powered by GitHub Pages, Jekyll, and this GitHub Action.